Eric Burger (eburger@snowshore.com)
Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:01:19 -0400
I'm not looking for "How to Implement WAV." I know that already :-)
What I need for VoiceXML, and what we need for IVM, is a Normative Reference
for WAV that's acceptable to the IETF and W3C. An RFC will do for IVM; all
the W3C needs is an IANA registration.
-----Original Message-----
From: Laile L. Di Silvestro [mailto:laile@mindspring.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:44 PM
To: eburger@snowshore.com; Graham Klyne
Cc: Vpim Mail List
Subject: Re: [VPIM] audio/wav
I co-authored a draft a while ago. There are some errors that need to be
corrected. Due to a lack of a clear published WAV standard and multiple
incompatible implementations on the market, I believe that both this draft
(in informational form) and the IANA registration will be necessary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
To: <eburger@snowshore.com>
Cc: "Vpim Mail List" <vpim@lists.neystadt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [VPIM] audio/wav
> Eric,
>
> I recall some debate about this a year or so ago. A draft was written
> (even published as RFC?), and I understand the authors thought that was a
> registration. But as you say, it's not in the IANA registry.
>
> #g
> --
>
> At 11:24 AM 8/27/01 -0400, Eric Burger wrote:
> >Has anyone registered audio/wav? I didn't see it in the IANA registry.
> >It's referenced in draft-ietf-vpim-ivm. The usage there follows
> >audio/vnd.wave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Aug 31 2001 - 16:00:51 IDT