Antony Bowesman (adb@teamware.com)
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:44:58 +0300
Hello,
The Teamware Office mail system (Teamware is a Fujitsu company) will
send the following MDNs
manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed
manual-action/MDN-sent-automatically; displayed
and automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically with the disposition
types/modifiers
deleted / expired (auto expiry of mail)
deleted / superseded (auto replacement of mail)
deleted / mailbox-terminated (mailbox no longer exists)
deleted
dispatched (mail auto-forwarded)
If the original mail was originated from the mail system then it will
receive and retain information in a (non)receipt-notification structure
which can be displayed in the mail client from the following info
manual-action
automatic-action
processed
deleted / expired
deleted / superseded
deleted / mailbox-terminated
deleted
dispatched
If the original mail was not from the system then the MDN will be
delivered as a message.
Rgds
Antony
-- Teamware Group adb@teamware.com tel: +358 9 5128 2562 fax: +358 9 5128 2705"McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote: > > I would like to add to the voices by expressing that Xerox products > in the field do implement the dispatched feature as described by > others. > > Next steps is for us to get together and conduct a simple series of > sends/receives between our implementations and document the outcome > (e.g. successful/unsuccessful exchange, interpretation and identity > of test partners). This documentation should then be provided to > the WG chair(s) who would submit it to the Area Director with the > protocol action request. > > Shibata, Iwazaki and Toyoda-san please let me know if you desire to > make plans for testing. > > Lloyd > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shibata Tetsuya [mailto:shibata@ns1.nara.sharp.co.jp] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:27 AM > > To: 'tony@att.com'; 'Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com' > > Cc: 'receipt@cs.utk.edu'; 'vpim@lists.neystadt.org'; > > 'ietf-fax@imc.org' > > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt > > > > > > I am a developer working at SHARP. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tony Hansen [mailto:tony@att.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:24 AM > > > To: McIntyre, Lloyd > > > Cc: receipt@cs.utk.edu; vpim@lists.neystadt.org; ietf-fax@imc.org > > > Subject: Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D > > ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of > > anything we > > > removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document. > > > > > > So, just let us know of the implementations. > > > > > > Tony Hansen > > > tony@att.com > > > > > > "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote: > > > > We have already developed the prototype which built in the > > "dispatched" feature. > > > > We implemented almost the same as MGCS & TOSHIBA TEC. > > > > "dispatched" without modifiers when succesfully decoding the > > received TIFF-FX file. > > "processed/error" in the case of the failure. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tetsuya Shibata > > SHARP CORPORATION
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Aug 30 2001 - 10:45:12 IDT