ned.freed@mrochek.com
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:29:23 -0800 (PST)
The IESG is concerned that draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-04.txt
does not contain an explicit applicability statement. It is
the IESG's understanding that this messaging service profile
is intended to be used between voice messaging systems while
the upcoming IVM work is the profile intended to be used
to communicate with desktop system. If so, this document
needs to avoid confusion by stating what its domain of
applicability is.
Neither draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-dur-01.txt nor
draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-32k-02.txt indicate what, if
anything, has changed since the previous version. Simply
adding a statement to the effect that "the only changes
between this document and RFC xxxx are editorial in nature"
would address this.
RFC 2422 says:
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|B3|B2|B1|B0|A3|A2|A1|A0|
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
MSB -> | 7| 6| 5| 4| 3| 2| 1| 0| <- LSB
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
32K ADPCM / Octet Mapping
draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-32k-02.txt says:
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|B3|B2|B1|B0|A3|A2|A1|A0|
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
MSB -> | 7| 6| 5| 4| 3| 2| 1| 0| <- LSB
+--+-- --
32K ADPCM / Octet Mapping
This is a minor issue, but there's probably no reason not to fix it
to be
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|B3|B2|B1|B0|A3|A2|A1|A0|
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
MSB -> | 7| 6| 5| 4| 3| 2| 1| 0| <- LSB
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
32K ADPCM / Octet Mapping
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Jan 29 2002 - 05:36:31 IST