Bobby Sardana (sardana@obsoft.com)
Sun, 07 Oct 2001 22:30:40 -0700
Glenn Parsons wrote:
>
>
> At 11:35 PM -0700 10/3/01, Bobby Sardana wrote:
>
> >I was wondering as to how difficult it is to set up this
> autoresponder?
> >Are there any plans to set this up so that others can test
> against it?
> >I agree that providing a test-bed for VPIM client compliance
> will definitely
> >spur development.
>
> Not difficult at all. IMC is happy to do this if we are given a
> handful of messages that everyone agrees are correctly formatted.
>
> Thanks Paul, but we already have one that has been running for over a
> year now. It is accessible under the Conformance- Sample Messages
> section of the VPIM page ( http://www.ema.org/vpim )and gets regular
> use. Though it has not resulted in a raft of new declarations for
> support of VPIM...
The client compliance I was talking about is the one where IMAP can be
used to retrieve voice mail store. Not the ones to populate two
compliant voice mail stores via VPIM. Is there a test-bed for the IMAP
retrieval? Though I am aware that setting up a IMAP server is trivial,
but was hoping if an actual simulator/Voice Mail Server with IMAP
capability can be tested with.
Regards,
Bobby Sardana.
sardana@obsoft.com
>
>
> As for an interoperability event (you can't call it a "bakeoff"
> without getting a nastygram from Betty Crocker's lawyers), IMC
> could
> easily set up a free online one for IMC members, or a paid
> face-to-face one for everyone. Just let me know.
>
> I would encourage another interop event -- but I do not have the
> bandwidth to organize it. If folks are interested in having another
> event, then we could get the IMC to set one up or have the EMA arrange
> something. Is anyone else interested in an interop event?
>
> Cheers,
> Glenn.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:25:58 IST