Re: WG Last Call on IVM Goals/Requirements


James P. Salsman (bovik@best.com)
Mon, 14 May 2001 17:18:46 -0700 (PDT)


My only comment on draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-goals-02 is that even though
the final sentence of section 4.1.2 makes it clear that the 32 kb/s
version of G.726 is meant, it would be great to make that explicit in
section 4.4.1, and maybe even the [G726] citation, which could be
easily done by changing the reference to [G726-32].

Thanks, Emily, and everyone else who has worked on this. Now that I
have found the compliance listings (wow!), I see there is no need for
an update on the progress of these goals.

Cheers,
James



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue May 15 2001 - 03:19:03 IDT