Glenn Parsons (gparsons@nortelnetworks.com)
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:46:03 -0400
I think this is a result of moving from Unix to Win NT to Unix ... for our
web server. I'll have this fixed. But your best reference is the RFC.
The VPIM message sending script is also quite useful.
The noticeable change with the revision for Draft Standard status
<draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt> is the dropping of vCard. The rest is
mostly wording cleanup.
Cheers,
Glenn.
> ----------
> From: James P. Salsman
> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 1:50 am
> To: Parsons, Glenn [CAR:6L81:EXCH]
> Cc: vpim@lists.neystadt.org
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] guidance on basic VPIM please
>
> Glenn,
>
> Thanks for your message.
>
> http://www.ema.org/vpim/specs/samplems.htm has some problems; on
> Win32 Netscape 4.x, it renders the headers double-spaced, which
> seems like bad form, inside a < pre > ... < /pre > block.
>
> I will stick with RFC 2421's Appendix B. Are there any substantive
> changes in draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt?
>
> Cheers,
> James
>
> > From: "Glenn Parsons" <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com>
> > To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org, "'James P. Salsman'" <bovik@best.com>
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] guidance on basic VPIM please
> > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:52:36 -0400
> >
> > All is described in RFC 2421 - a Proposed Standard. Its update to move
> to
> > Draft Standard status is <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt>. This latter
> > document has finished WG last call, and will go for IETF last call
> shortly.
> >
> > There is a sample VPIM message sender that you might find useful on the
> VPIM
> > website ( http://www.ema.org/vpim ) under 'Conformance'
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Glenn.
> >
> >> ----------
> >> From: James P. Salsman
> >> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:00 PM
> >> To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org
> >> Subject: [VPIM] guidance on basic VPIM please
> >>
> >> Where is the right place to point people for documentation of the
> >> simplest VPIM-conformant internet message, with just one audio part,
> >> using G.726 at 32 kb/s?
> >>
> >> I know I've seen this in a draft somewhere, but which is the most
> >> current and authorative, that shows all the main and MIME headers?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> James
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jul 16 2001 - 16:46:53 IDT