James P. Salsman (bovik@best.com)
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Glenn,
Thanks for your message.
http://www.ema.org/vpim/specs/samplems.htm has some problems; on
Win32 Netscape 4.x, it renders the headers double-spaced, which
seems like bad form, inside a < pre > ... < /pre > block.
I will stick with RFC 2421's Appendix B. Are there any substantive
changes in draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt?
Cheers,
James
> From: "Glenn Parsons" <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com>
> To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org, "'James P. Salsman'" <bovik@best.com>
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] guidance on basic VPIM please
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:52:36 -0400
>
> All is described in RFC 2421 - a Proposed Standard. Its update to move to
> Draft Standard status is <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-03.txt>. This latter
> document has finished WG last call, and will go for IETF last call shortly.
>
> There is a sample VPIM message sender that you might find useful on the VPIM
> website ( http://www.ema.org/vpim ) under 'Conformance'
>
> Cheers,
> Glenn.
>
>> ----------
>> From: James P. Salsman
>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:00 PM
>> To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org
>> Subject: [VPIM] guidance on basic VPIM please
>>
>> Where is the right place to point people for documentation of the
>> simplest VPIM-conformant internet message, with just one audio part,
>> using G.726 at 32 kb/s?
>>
>> I know I've seen this in a draft somewhere, but which is the most
>> current and authorative, that shows all the main and MIME headers?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> James
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 14 2001 - 08:50:50 IDT