Re: [VPIM] re: SORT and arbitrary headers


Tony Hansen (tony@att.com)
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:39:52 -0500


Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> --On Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:43 PM -0800 Mark Crispin
> <MRC@cac.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> I would say its 50-50 use between sort and thread. I know personally there
> are mailboxes I prefer to view by thread and ones I prefer to view sorted -
> just depends on the nature of the content.

Me too. My default on some mailboxes is thread, and others sort by date,
and others sort by sender, and others .... However, I also switch around
from one sort method to another, depending on what I'm trying to do with
the messages. Each of the sorting methods and threading has their uses
in different circumstances.

> There are also situations where
> I want to do a sort within thread.

ditto.

        Tony Hansen
        tony@att.com

P.S. I thought I was going to add lots to the debate, but it looks like
I wound up with just another "me too" message. :-)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Dec 14 2001 - 18:05:20 IST