McIntyre, Lloyd (Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com)
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:36:16 -0700
Dan,
Your comments are consistent with my expectations.
We need to start planning for realization.
Lloyd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:08 PM
> To: McIntyre, Lloyd; 'Shibata Tetsuya'; tony@att.com
> Cc: receipt@cs.utk.edu; vpim@lists.neystadt.org; ietf-fax@imc.org
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
>
>
> Note we need vendors to both send _and_ receive the various
> permutations. If all implementations only send and do not parse
> or validate or do something on receipt, it doesn't pass muster
> for Draft Standard.
>
> -d
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McIntyre, Lloyd [mailto:Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:11 AM
> > To: 'Shibata Tetsuya'; 'tony@att.com'; McIntyre, Lloyd
> > Cc: 'receipt@cs.utk.edu'; 'vpim@lists.neystadt.org';
> 'ietf-fax@imc.org'
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> >
> >
> > I would like to add to the voices by expressing that Xerox
> products in the
> > field do implement the dispatched feature as described by others.
> >
> > Next steps is for us to get together and conduct a simple series of
> > sends/receives between our implementations and document the
> outcome (e.g.
> > successful/unsuccessful exchange, interpretation and
> identity of test
> > partners). This documentation should then be provided to the WG
> > chair(s) who
> > would submit it to the Area Director with the protocol
> action request.
> >
> > Shibata, Iwazaki and Toyoda-san please let me know if you
> desire to make
> > plans for testing.
> >
> > Lloyd
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shibata Tetsuya [mailto:shibata@ns1.nara.sharp.co.jp]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:27 AM
> > > To: 'tony@att.com'; 'Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com'
> > > Cc: 'receipt@cs.utk.edu'; 'vpim@lists.neystadt.org';
> > > 'ietf-fax@imc.org'
> > > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D
> ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > I am a developer working at SHARP.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tony Hansen [mailto:tony@att.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:24 AM
> > > > To: McIntyre, Lloyd
> > > > Cc: receipt@cs.utk.edu; vpim@lists.neystadt.org;
> ietf-fax@imc.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D
> > > ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of
> > > anything we
> > > > removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document.
> > > >
> > > > So, just let us know of the implementations.
> > > >
> > > > Tony Hansen
> > > > tony@att.com
> > > >
> > > > "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote:
> > >
> > > We have already developed the prototype which built in the
> > > "dispatched" feature.
> > >
> > > We implemented almost the same as MGCS & TOSHIBA TEC.
> > >
> > > "dispatched" without modifiers when succesfully decoding the
> > > received TIFF-FX file.
> > > "processed/error" in the case of the failure.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tetsuya Shibata
> > > SHARP CORPORATION
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Aug 29 2001 - 00:36:32 IDT