Dan Wing (dwing@cisco.com)
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:08:12 -0700
Note we need vendors to both send _and_ receive the various
permutations. If all implementations only send and do not parse
or validate or do something on receipt, it doesn't pass muster
for Draft Standard.
-d
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McIntyre, Lloyd [mailto:Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:11 AM
> To: 'Shibata Tetsuya'; 'tony@att.com'; McIntyre, Lloyd
> Cc: 'receipt@cs.utk.edu'; 'vpim@lists.neystadt.org'; 'ietf-fax@imc.org'
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
>
>
> I would like to add to the voices by expressing that Xerox products in the
> field do implement the dispatched feature as described by others.
>
> Next steps is for us to get together and conduct a simple series of
> sends/receives between our implementations and document the outcome (e.g.
> successful/unsuccessful exchange, interpretation and identity of test
> partners). This documentation should then be provided to the WG
> chair(s) who
> would submit it to the Area Director with the protocol action request.
>
> Shibata, Iwazaki and Toyoda-san please let me know if you desire to make
> plans for testing.
>
> Lloyd
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shibata Tetsuya [mailto:shibata@ns1.nara.sharp.co.jp]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:27 AM
> > To: 'tony@att.com'; 'Lloyd.McIntyre@pahv.xerox.com'
> > Cc: 'receipt@cs.utk.edu'; 'vpim@lists.neystadt.org';
> > 'ietf-fax@imc.org'
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> >
> >
> > I am a developer working at SHARP.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tony Hansen [mailto:tony@att.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:24 AM
> > > To: McIntyre, Lloyd
> > > Cc: receipt@cs.utk.edu; vpim@lists.neystadt.org; ietf-fax@imc.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D
> > ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of
> > anything we
> > > removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document.
> > >
> > > So, just let us know of the implementations.
> > >
> > > Tony Hansen
> > > tony@att.com
> > >
> > > "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote:
> >
> > We have already developed the prototype which built in the
> > "dispatched" feature.
> >
> > We implemented almost the same as MGCS & TOSHIBA TEC.
> >
> > "dispatched" without modifiers when succesfully decoding the
> > received TIFF-FX file.
> > "processed/error" in the case of the failure.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tetsuya Shibata
> > SHARP CORPORATION
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Aug 28 2001 - 23:08:54 IDT