Eric Burger (eburger@snowshore.com)
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:27:36 -0500
Actually, what you describe is better achieved with critical content (coming
soon!).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vpim@lists.neystadt.org
> [mailto:owner-vpim@lists.neystadt.org]On Behalf Of Dave_Aronson@3com.com
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: vpim@lists.neystadt.org
> Subject: Re: [VPIM] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-vpim-hint-02.txt
>
>
>
>
> Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> writes:
>
> > If a
> > user receives a fax message, and forwards it on via the phone
> system after
> > recording an audio introduction ("hi Jim, here's a fax I got from Fred,
> > can you deal with it?") what sort of message is it? Is it a voicemail?
> > A fax? something else? With Message-Context, we can simply say 'it's
> > whatever it was originally'. So in the case just given, it's
> still a fax,
> > but with an audio annotation on it.
>
> However, enough additional information could certainly be added
> in the audio
> part, to make it at least as important as the fax part. Perhaps
> the spec could
> add a line to the effect that a compliant UA should, when
> forwarding a message,
> at least somehow allow the user to replace the M-C.
>
> --
> Dave Aronson, postmaster@airnsun.dcfido.org
> Sysop, Air 'n Sun free Fidonet BBS, (703) 319-0714
> http://www.geocities.com/davearonson (updated 2001-02-02)
> All opinions MINE; for rent at reasonable rates.
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Feb 09 2001 - 21:27:56 IST