Neystadt, John (John_Neystadt@icomverse.com)
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 23:38:42 +0200
ua-media doesn't fits well, we are not talking about user agents here.
I think registering media feaure "pages" is a better one.
What should be done to go forward with this. It seems to small item for an
RFC, can't we take tremp and add it into
draft-ietf-conneg-content-features.txt?
John Neystadt
john@neystadt.org
http://www.neystadt.org/john/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
> Sent: Thu, February 10, 2000 4:35 AM
> To: ned.freed@innosoft.com
> Cc: Neystadt, John; IETF VPIM List; ietf-fax@imc.org
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] Analogy to Content-Duration for Faxes
>
>
>
> # > Content-Features: pages=10
>
> # > to note a 10-page document.
>
> # Might even want to have an additional attribute to say what
> sort of "page"
> # you're talking about.
>
> RFC 2534 already registers 'ua-media' tag with values such as
> 'screen-paged'
> and 'stationery' (most likely the kind of pages you'd want
> with faxes), and
> a 'paper-size' tag with additional token values. At the time
> RFC 2534 was
> written, we were focusing mainly on media features for
> recipients rather
> than
> for content; you might still want to characterize a fax
> recipient as having
> a maximum number of pages its willing to receive, though.
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Mar 07 2000 - 23:40:53 IST