Graham Klyne (gk-lists@dial.pipex.com)
Sun, 03 Dec 2000 09:32:16 +0000
At 03:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Byung Hee Choung wrote:
>Reading through draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-01.txt I had a question.
>
>In the sender field, I think VPIM format expects that it will contain the
>phone number of the sending user. How have systems dealt with sending
>phone numbers of users who have 'unlisted' phone numbers? Is it expected
>that a 'pseudo' phone number will be used, in which case a reply back to
>the send will not be supported?
How does this differ from a caller-ID normally being sent for a phone call,
even if the caller is unlisted? I think "listing" and sender anonymity are
two distinct issues.
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Content Technologies Ltd.
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Dec 03 2000 - 19:14:59 IST