ned.freed@innosoft.com
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
> > Roger, I wrote to receipt a few months ago trying to determine if
> > anyone was actively working to progress MDN to DRAFT from PROPOSED.
> > VPIM v2 can't advance until 2298 advances, and the VPIM WG would like
> > 2421 to move on. Ned asserted during the VPIM meeting that changes
> > are needed to 2298, before it can advance. Are you interested and
> > able to take care of the changes Ned's alluding to?
> >
> > My plea went unheeded, so I'm appealing to you as the author.
> >
> > Are their sufficient implementations of 2298 to advance? Are there
> > portions of 2298 that need revision?
> >
> > Do you even have time to pursue this?
> >
> > I'm looking forward to hearing from you!
> I'm willing to work on it if the revisions aren't too extensive. I'm
> not sure what changes Ned has in mind.
As I said in my followup, the only changes I have in mind are the removal of
features that don't make the draft standard cut. I expect there to be a number
of these.
Ned
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Aug 03 2000 - 15:52:19 IDT