Re: Fwd: Variations on a MDN theme


Roger Fajman (RAF@CU.NIH.GOV)
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:16:07 -0400 (EDT)


> Roger, I wrote to receipt a few months ago trying to determine if
> anyone was actively working to progress MDN to DRAFT from PROPOSED.
> VPIM v2 can't advance until 2298 advances, and the VPIM WG would like
> 2421 to move on. Ned asserted during the VPIM meeting that changes
> are needed to 2298, before it can advance. Are you interested and
> able to take care of the changes Ned's alluding to?
>
> My plea went unheeded, so I'm appealing to you as the author.
>
> Are their sufficient implementations of 2298 to advance? Are there
> portions of 2298 that need revision?
>
> Do you even have time to pursue this?
>
> I'm looking forward to hearing from you!

I'm willing to work on it if the revisions aren't too extensive. I'm
not sure what changes Ned has in mind. There are some corrections,
clarifications, and updates to references, I'm sure. The biggest thing
that I am aware of is changing to the new ABNF in order to align with
822bis.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Aug 02 2000 - 01:18:59 IDT