Philipp Hoschka (ph@w3.org)
Sat, 14 Aug 1999 13:20:37 +0200
Graham,
I do not think due to possible formal errors that were
made in the registration of RFC 2361, it is a worthwhile effort
to start the whole registration process from scratch, redoing IESG
review, discussion on this list etc. I also still doubt that you
can define WAVE in the IETF without cooperation of the current
owner of change control.
However, if the people responsible for this at the IESG think this
is a worthwhile effort, I rest my case.
Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> At 14:11 13/08/99 +0200, Philipp Hoschka wrote:
>
> >> I cannot see a registration of MIME type audio/vnd.wave in this. I also
> >> note that IANA does not list any registration for audio/vnd.wave.
> >
> >As already pointed out by others, the RFC mentions the MIME type
> >audio/vnd.wave many times (with "the RFC" i am referring to RFC 2361).
>
> But "mention" is not a "definition" or "registration".
>
> Based on RFC 2361, I would not know how to construct a WAVE envelope. Or
> where to look to find out. Sure, I can find some useful things to put into
> that envelope, but that's not my primary concern here.
>
> #g
>
> ------------
> Graham Klyne
> (GK@ACM.ORG)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Mar 19 2002 - 01:04:41 IDT